With Warmth From Warmth Pumps, US Power Necessities Might Plummet By 50%


Just lately I had a type of embarrassing aha moments, one the place one thing is so apparent that it not occurring to me a lot sooner made me cringe. Nonetheless, higher late than by no means. And what was the epiphany? Effectively, that really helpful vitality we now have to make will drop drastically once we apply warmth pumps in every single place doable in industrial, residential, and industrial heating.

This dialogue has to begin with Sankey vitality circulation diagrams. I shared a bunch of them from completely different organizations and nations just a few weeks in the past in an prolonged piece the place I thought of the necessities for an vitality futures simulator. For this dialogue I’ll begin with the LLNL US vitality flows diagram.

LLNL US Energy Flow Diagram for 2021 highlighting key energy services

LLNL US Power Circulation Diagram for 2021 highlighting key vitality providers

These numbers are in quads, which is to say quadrillion British Thermal Models (BTU) equivalents. The LLNL methodology converts all the things into frequent models, which is a painful and normally thankless train, so I’m glad they’ve finished it.

Two factors about quads. The primary is that LLNL’s methodology for changing renewable electrical energy into quads assumes fossil gasoline plant warmth charges for effectivity, which appears odd and I nonetheless haven’t gotten to the underside of. It might be that they’re understating renewables main vitality because of this, or it could be acceptable, however I haven’t discovered documentation or growth on that. If anybody has a great pointer to their decisions, please let me know. The second, after all, is the irony of the US persisting in utilizing Imperial measurements.

What’s the main vitality fallacy? Effectively, it’s the idea that we now have to exchange all the first vitality inputs on the left hand aspect of the chart above, versus simply the vitality providers together with those I’ve known as out. Take this piece for instance: EIA: World vitality consumption to extend 28% by 2040. That’s a US projection by the Power Data Administration, a special group than LLNL however a part of the identical authorities. Left hand please speak to proper hand.

What we actually have to exchange is the vitality providers in gentle grey bins on the precise hand aspect of the chart. That’s proper, the US doesn’t want to exchange 97.3 quads of vitality, it wants to exchange 31.8 quads of vitality. Or does it even want to try this?

Can we scale back the massive wasted vitality mirrored within the rejected vitality field? Positive, that’s why the mantra is electrify all the things. (For nitpickers, the ‘doable’ within the mantra is silent and implied, to not point out vastly bigger than nitpickers assume or want to be true.) Utilizing electrical energy in electrical motors is vastly extra environment friendly than utilizing gasoline or diesel in vehicles or vans for instance, about 4 occasions extra environment friendly.

As I’ve identified numerous occasions, when the US will get finished with pretending that each one floor transportation received’t be electrified, over 80% of vitality necessities for transportation can be absolutely electrified, together with rail. With most home aviation, all inland transport and quite a lot of nearshore transport electrifying within the coming many years, 21.2 quads of rejected vitality from transportation will plummet to maybe 2 quads.

And, after all, many of the electrical energy can be flowing from wind and photo voltaic pretty instantly into grid-tied and battery-electric autos, so there can be loads fewer losses from burning coal and fuel for electrical energy. Wind and photo voltaic have transmission and storage losses, that are minimal, whereas fuel and coal throw away 50% or extra of the first vitality in them out of the field, after which have the transmission and storage losses on prime of that.

In late 2020, I identified that Invoice Gates’ favourite vitality guru, Vaclav Smil, fully missed rejected vitality, ignoring it in his printed dyspeptic view of the vitality transition. Gates apparently has learn all 38 or so Smil’s books, and that has led to one of many world’s richest and most influential males and a founding father of Breakthrough Power Ventures lacking the boat on vitality for properly over a decade. It was solely months later in mid-2021 that Smil lastly printed a brief piece acknowledging the first vitality fallacy. Even then his dyspeptic pessimism persevered. It’s unclear if the implications of electrification had sunk in for him, by no means thoughts for the legions of individuals like Gates who he has misinformed. And to be clear, I agree with Smil that the transition will take many years, I simply have a a lot smaller variety of many years in thoughts.

The first vitality fallacy is pervasive. Within the linked article, the EIA tasks a rise of 161 quads of vitality globally by 2050, principally from elevated use of fossil fuels. That headline was from 2017, however even their 2021 projections by way of 2050 replicate large progress of main vitality calls for, when the other can be true. Peak coal demand from 2013? Peak oil demand coming this decade more than likely? Peak pure fuel subsequent decade? Not in line with the EIA. Power providers will nonetheless develop whilst main vitality shrinks. Or will it?

Renewables to electrified vitality providers can be sipping delicately at main vitality, in contrast to the messy gluttony round vitality seen at the moment.

Desk of US 2021 residential, industrial and industrial vitality providers and rejected vitality by writer

Let’s have a look at the vitality providers I highlighted a bit extra carefully. I’ve moved numbers off the chart right into a tabular type to make this a bit clearer.

Heating and cooling are the largest vitality attracts within the residential class, representing 55% of vitality demand per the identical EIA that’s confused by the first vitality fallacy above. The vast majority of that’s for heating the constructing and heating water. That implies that about 2.2 quads of residential vitality providers are for heating air and water.

And warmth is the first supply of rejected vitality. For these constructing sorts, the biggest supply of rejected vitality is waste warmth. There are comparatively straightforward fixes for many of them, ones that can be added an increasing number of over time for easy value effectiveness causes.

Why is the proportion of heating vital to notice? Warmth pumps get about two-thirds of their vitality from the setting and one-third from electrical energy. They transfer warmth from place to position, simply as a fridge or air conditioner does at the moment. That implies that 2.2 quads of vitality providers drops to about 0.7 quads. That’s 1.5 quads that don’t should be supplied by us through routes from main vitality sources. Varied different issues means wasted vitality in residential settings will drop as properly, principally by way of continued electrification and extra stable state expertise changing all the things within the residence. Can scorching water be heated with a warmth pump? Sure, sure it might probably. Fashionable warmth pumps can present hot-water heater temperature water for faucets or radiant heating. A bit extra insulation wouldn’t damage and can doubtless be added at conversion to warmth pumps within the coming many years to optimize the economics.

What about industrial buildings? Effectively, the EIA signifies {that a} third of all industrial constructing vitality is for heating, with out splitting out scorching water. That means that 1.9 quads of vitality turns into 0.65 quads of demand. Wait, the identical supply says that electrical energy is already the dominant heating supply for industrial buildings. Does that matter? No, it doesn’t. Electrical base board heaters, compelled air heaters, and scorching water heaters simply run electrical energy by way of resistance coils like these on range tops, which suggests one unit of electrical energy turns into one unit of warmth, simply as burning pure fuel does. Warmth pumps flip one unit of electrical energy into three models of warmth.

Industrial? This one is more durable. Loads of industrial warmth is above 200° Celsius, the present affordable restrict for industrial warmth pumps, and properly above the 100° restrict for present mature warmth pump applied sciences. How a lot? Effectively, 45% of business warmth is beneath 200° and 25% is beneath 100°. That implies that with present commoditized warmth pumps we are able to already handle 2.1 quads of business warmth demand, turning it into 0.7 quads. And with properly understood technical pathways, some engineering, manufacturing and distribution, we may handle 3.8 quads. Since we’re speaking finish sport, let’s use the largest quantity and maintain on the simplified ratio of 1 unit of electrical energy for 3 models of warmth. That turns 3.8 quads into 1.3 quads. A bunch of the rejected vitality is unhealthy insulation, creating extra warmth in a single place and never reusing it in one other, and creating extra warmth that’s out of time sequence with demand elsewhere. Higher insulation, electrical warmth sources which can be extra tightly built-in with processes and so much less wasteful, and a few thermal storage will enhance effectivity there as properly.

What does this all flip into?

Table of US projected residential, commercial, and industrial energy services and rejected energy with heat pumps etc by author

Desk of US projected residential, industrial, and industrial vitality providers and rejected vitality with warmth pumps and so forth by writer

As an alternative of 26.2 quads of vitality providers, 20.5 quads, a couple of 38% discount in vitality providers necessities. And with renewables flowing by way of some transmission and storage, main vitality necessities plummet from 46.64 quads to 24.6 quads, a couple of 47% drop in main vitality demand.

In order that’s the eureka second I had that was so lengthy delayed. Warmth pumps would really drop vitality service necessities considerably. As an alternative of getting to exchange all vitality providers, we solely have to exchange the portion of warmth we are able to’t get from the setting totally free. Our economies have huge room to develop helpful outputs with out growing vitality providers in any respect. 20% ‘vitality’ providers demand progress by 2050? No downside. 20% enhance in main vitality? Get a grip.

The overwhelming majority of those large vitality financial savings concerned making use of present applied sciences, ones which can be already scaled commodities. Like producing extra low-carbon electrical energy with renewables, transferring it with HVDC, and storing it as crucial with closed-loop pumped hydro — no invention is required, simply deployment.

Let’s do another calculation. Let’s add transportation again into the combination. Bear in mind, 2 quads rejected vitality when all the things doable is inspired. Meaning about 8 quads of main vitality necessities. Added to the roughly 25 quads of main vitality necessities for industrial, residential, and industrial vitality providers, that’s about 33 quads of main vitality necessities.. The biomass must shift to biofuels for the arduous to decarbonize segments of aviation and marine transport, however these are small segments of general vitality demand.

So what number of quads do wind, photo voltaic, hydro, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass present the US economic system at the moment? Over 20. About 80% of the vitality necessities of a totally electrified society with warmth pumps in every single place doable exist already. Electrification and warmth pumps radically scale back the requirement to construct new wind, photo voltaic, nuclear, hydro and geothermal main vitality sources.

Is that this the doubtless consequence? No, under no circumstances, not less than not within the US by 2050. Amongst different issues, human nature is constructed on Jevons Paradox, so individuals will open home windows within the wintertime whereas turning the warmth up, and fixing industrial heating faces many headwinds. And to be clear, whereas I’m comfy with the warmth pump ratios, I’m doing a little bit of arm waving on remaining rejected vitality, in order that may be greater.

However it’s indicative of the size of the doable, and it’s doubtless the place issues can be in 2100. It’s a lot nearer to actuality than projections by these caught within the main vitality fallacy. It’s a transparent indication {that a} transition to a low-carbon economic system with all the identical comforts, journey, and the like that we now have now’s properly inside attain. It’s additionally the perfect path for rising economies to take from the beginning, simply as they went straight to wi-fi knowledge and voice, bypassing knowledge flowing over wires into each residence and workplace. Oh, and all that wasted warmth at the moment? It’s strongly correlated with inexperienced home fuel emissions and health-harming air air pollution too. What number of wins is that?

UPDATE: We reached out to Mark Z. Jacobson at Stanford with a follow-up query, which he was gracious sufficient to reply with the next data:

Q: Does the Stanford state of affairs modeling of 100% renewables by 2050 have a strategy for decreased vitality service necessities by way of software of warmth pump applied sciences, and if that’s the case, how is it calculated?

A: Sure, ever since our first examine in 2009, we now have accounted for decreased end-use vitality wants as a result of electrification with warmth pumps, electrical autos, and electrified trade.

Here’s a abstract I posted on LinkedIn the opposite day:

We now have been treating vitality reductions like you’re proposing since 2009 (e.g., initially on this article https://net.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/sad1109Jaco5p.indd.pdf) First, we begin with end-use vitality (from IEA), which is vitality instantly utilized by a shopper. It’s the vitality embodied in electrical energy, pure fuel, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and jet gasoline that folks use instantly. It equals main vitality minus the vitality misplaced in changing main vitality to end-use vitality, together with the vitality misplaced throughout transmission and distribution and waste warmth. We then electrify all finish makes use of. So, for instance, going from a gasoline automotive to an electrical automotive reduces end-use vitality by one other ~75% past the conversion from oil to gasoline as does going from a pure fuel water or air heater to a warmth pump. Right here is the newest abstract of all of the vitality reductions previous end-use vitality between BAU and WWS. https://net.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/145Country/145-Timeline.pdf There are 5 main vitality saving: as a result of EVs vs ICEs; warmth pumps versus combustion; electrifying trade; eliminating vitality as a result of mining fuels; and end-use vitality enhancements past BAU.

I’m pretty positive IPCC situations ignore most if not all 5 of those reductions, although.

Mea culpa: a pointy eyed reader seen I’d transposed some numbers in an earlier model of this evaluation. It ended up being near a wash ultimately end result, however the article has nonetheless been corrected.


I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, however it all the time felt flawed — and it was all the time powerful to determine what we should always put behind there. In principle, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it! We simply don’t love paywalls, and so we have determined to ditch ours.

Sadly, the media enterprise continues to be a tricky, cut-throat enterprise with tiny margins. It is a unending Olympic problem to remain above water and even maybe — gasp — develop. So …


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.