Join every day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!
What number of methods to withstand electrification are there? What number of cognitive biases get in the best way? I’ve discovered a number of them, however lately I found one other. Ports are within the enterprise of dealing with huge honking plenty of gases, liquids and solids, and so are predisposed to assume that there are going to be plenty of vitality carrying molecules of their ports for use by port autos.
How do I do know this? In latest months I’ve had a few nice conversations with Sahar Rashidbeigi. She is the worldwide head of decarbonization for A.P. Moller Maersk’s APM Terminals division. APM has the concessions for about 70 of the roughly 800 ports globally that deal with over US$8 trillion of containers yearly. Maersk is a globally built-in logistics firm that has a core in container transport, however divisions like APM that deal with container logistics off of the deep blue sea as effectively.
Rashidbeigi and her staff lately dropped a report, Reaching a tipping level in Battery-Electrical Container Dealing with Gear, the place but once more a complete price of possession comparability had been pressured upon them, and which but once more discovered the bleedingly apparent, that the entire price of possession (TCO) for hydrogen powered autos was rather a lot larger than for battery electrical autos.
Rashidbeigi engaged Auke Hoekstra, Program Director NEON analysis at Eindhoven College of Know-how, and his staff to construct the TCO mannequin. Hoekstra based the 35 PhD analysis group to mild the best way to zero emission vitality and mobility. I’m certain that there’s one thing he and I disagree about after operating the numbers, however I haven’t discovered it but. He and his staff do rock strong work.
When Rashidbeigi joined APM after stints with McKinsey, Schlumberger, an funding fund and with a civil engineering diploma from Iran and an MBA from Harvard, she thought she was taking an implementation job. From the surface, the area is clearly one the place direct and battery electrification is the clearly apparent resolution, simply as it’s in each different type of floor transportation.
The cranes and overhead gantries had been already closely electrified, plugged into the grids and the gantries that had been nonetheless operating on diesel can be tied to the grid too. The assorted floor autos — flatbed vans with containers dropped onto them, straddle carriers that rolled over containers to choose them up from above and attain stackers which are like the other way up fork lifts grabbing carriers from the highest as an alternative of sliding prongs below them from the underside — had been all within the candy spot for electrification. As a civil engineer, Rashibeigi checked out prime speeds of fifty kilometers per hour, brief distances, flat and totally paved surfaces and the requirement for high-torque and like everybody else leapt to the conclusion that battery electrical autos can be the one actual resolution price contemplating.
And but, two years into her function, she’s launched a report the place the primary six pages are spent outlining the bleedingly apparent once more, with extra money and time wasted redoing TCO research which were completed to loss of life. She had her staff needed to write a hydrogen FAQ and a set of hydrogen questions for the executives and groups who ran APM ports globally, enabling them to fend off the droves of individuals pushing for hydrogen or by-product fuels with easy questions on long-term scaled prices with out subsidies.
What brought on this? One of many causes Rashidbeigi and I do know one another is as a result of she reached out to me early this 12 months to ask what was driving this clearly odd conduct round hydrogen for vitality and transportation. She’s STEM and enterprise circumstances literate from training and profession, so it’s apparent with out a lot problem in any respect to see that hydrogen simply isn’t efficient, environment friendly or cheaper than extra instantly electrifying, and she or he was baffled on the insistence of so many who it needed to be thought of.
As I mentioned to her, there have been a number of overlapping teams that shared frequent motivations that deeply biased their pondering. The fossil gas trade is the geological hydrocarbon trade, and that hydro is hydrogen. They clearly know that hydrogen for vitality is an financial nightmare, with inexperienced hydrogen requiring much more renewable electrical energy than we’ve got on the planet right this moment. Additional, they knew that blue hydrogen would get plenty of governmental cash to seize the CO2 and put it again underground, furthering fossil gas subsidies. They knew that blue hydrogen would probably all the time be cheaper, even when a lot much less environmentally pleasant, than inexperienced hydrogen, and so the one supply of hydrogen for vitality can be blue hydrogen. In addition they know that with hydrocarbons, splitting off the carbon won’t solely price cash, however eradicate a number of the vitality within the fossil gas. Within the case of methane, 45% of the vitality comes from the carbon in it. Blue hydrogen is a lose lose proposition for vitality for everyone besides the fossil gas trade. for them it’s a win-win.
As Michael Liebreich says, they will’t lose by pushing hydrogen for vitality. Both they delay actual decarbonization by one other decade, and they’re succeeding effectively in that. Or they get governments to provide them some huge cash to construct and function carbon sequestration applied sciences on prime of hydrogen manufacturing services. With out blue hydrogen being a significant supply of vitality, the worth of fossil gas agency’s reserves plummets. That cliff is coming.
Enter the bankers. The corporations closely into offering loans and fairness for the fossil gas trade are sometimes populated by STEM-illiterate finance varieties. Nothing flawed with that, however they depend upon the fossil gas corporations for STEM literacy and what is going to work. They usually actually don’t need to imagine that the fossil gas corporations’ funds are on quicksand as a result of if they’re, the banks go down with them, or no less than the precise bankers they work with. They’re extremely motivated to imagine the story the fossil gas trade is pitching.
Equally, governments with excessive fossil gas royalties like Norway, Canada, Australia and the USA are simple pickings for the fossil gas trade’s story. They don’t need the direct and oblique GDP contributions to go away. They don’t need the entire fossil gas staff to be out of labor. They don’t need the individuals who feed, dress and entertain the fossil gas staff to run wanting prospects. And politicians are steadily many nice issues, however STEM literacy is nowhere within the requirement set. Leaders like Angela Merkel along with her PhD in quantum chemistry are radical outliers, not the norm.
Then there are the industries which depend upon utilizing fossil fuels, most notably those that construct and promote inner combustion engines of varied descriptions. If hydrogen or artificial fuels derived from hydrogen aren’t dominant winners within the decarbonization sweepstakes, their mental capital is nugatory. I’ve handled individuals from Daimler, MAN, Bosch and Wärtsilä now who’re all struggling to push the hydrogen rope uphill as a result of in any other case their careers, their corporations and doubtless their retirement are in danger.
However after talking along with her once more lately, I’ve so as to add one other group to my listing of motivated thinkers: port organizations and the individuals in them. As she shared with me, the belief she handled time and again was that there can be large tonnages of decarbonized energy-carrying liquids and gases — inexperienced or blue hydrogen, ammonia, methanol or one thing else — flowing by means of and saved in ports, so why not use a fraction of them to energy port tools?
I’ve handled a few main transport issues with massive bulk transport divisions. They don’t seem to be anticipating large volumes of replacements for coal, oil and pure fuel to magically seem, though they’re undoubtedly hopeful. As a substitute, they’re making an attempt to determine what they’re going to do within the coming years. One engaged me to help them with strategic choices for 2030. As I famous earlier this 12 months, just one new very massive crude service is on order in 2023. The transport trade has discovered that huge volumes of bulk molecules are going away.
However port individuals apparently aren’t as conscious of this. Given the sheer quantity of hype associated to hydrogen and the reactive sheer quantity of hydrogen TCOs that make it clear it isn’t economically viable, it’s fairly simple to have affirmation bias overwhelm the cognitive dissonance of reviews like APM’s.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to counsel a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.
CleanTechnica Vacation Want E-book
Click on to obtain.
Our Newest EVObsession Video
I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, nevertheless it all the time felt flawed — and it was all the time robust to resolve what we must always put behind there. In principle, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it!! So, we have determined to utterly nix paywalls right here at CleanTechnica. However…
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.